Appeal No. 2000-1727
Application 08/486,114
sustained at the time of change-over to the second mode, and for
continuing the rotation of said drive means until the recording
of the image signal for one picture which is being recorded, even
if the operation of said operating means is released during
recording operation of said recording means and said operating
signal is interrupted and thereafter stopping said rotation.
References
The references relied on by the Examiner are as follows:
Adcock 4,057,830 Nov. 8, 1977
Morishita et al. (Morishita) 4,188,642 Feb. 12, 1980
Rejections at Issue
Claims 33,35-38, and 44-48 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as being unpatentable over Adcock and Morishita.
Rather than repeat the arguments of Appellants or
the Examiner, we make reference to the brief1 and the answer2 for
the details thereof.
OPINION
The issue on appeal is whether claims 33, 35-38, and 44-48
are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over
1 Appellants filed an Appeal Brief on August 9, 1999. We
will refer to this appeal brief as simply the Brief. Appellants
filed a reply brief on December 27, 1999. We will refer to this
reply brief as the Reply Brief.
2
2 The Examiner responded to Appellants’ Appeal Brief on
October 25, 1999. We will refer to this answer as simply the
Answer.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007