Ex Parte SAMARITANI et al - Page 23



                        FURTHER ORDERED that under 37 CFR § 1.196(b) our new                             
            ground of rejection shall not be considered final for purposes of                            
            judicial review.                                                                             
                        FURTHER ORDERED that applicants, WITHIN TWO MONTHS FROM                          
            THE DATE OF ENTRY OF THIS DECISION, must exercise one of the                                 
            following two options with respect to the new grounds of                                     
            rejection to avoid termination of proceedings (37 CFR § 1.197(c))                            
            as to the rejected claims:                                                                   
                              (1) Submit an appropriate amendment of                                     
                        the claims so rejected or a showing of facts                                     
                        relating to the claims so rejected, or both,                                     
                        and have the matter reconsidered by the                                          
                        examiner, in which event the application will                                    
                        be remanded to the examiner.                                                     
                              (2) Request that the application be                                        
                        reheard under § 1.197(b) by the Board of                                         
                        Patent Appeals and Interferences upon the                                        
                        same record.                                                                     
                        FURTHER ORDERED that since the appeal was presented on                           
            the basis that all claims stand or fall together, and that we                                
            have decided the appeal on that basis, should applicants elect to                            
            proceed before the examiner on remand [Option (1), supra], then                              
            our affirmance should be construed to be without prejudice to                                
            applicants presenting argument before the examiner maintaining                               
            that any of claims 2 through 16 are separately patentable from                               
            claim 1.                                                                                     

                                                - 23 -                                                   




Page:  Previous  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007