Ex Parte HOGGARTH et al - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2000-1755                                                                                        
              Application No. 08/828,014                                                                                  


                                                    BACKGROUND                                                            
                     The appellants' invention relates to an initial program load in data processing                      
              network.  An understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary                      
              claim 1, which is reproduced below.                                                                         
                     1.     A method of booting a client data processing system attached to a                             
                     control data processing system in a data processing network comprising:                              
                            at power-on or re-boot of a client system, issuing an initial program                         
                     load request from the client system onto the network; and                                            
                            responsive to the receipt of the initial program load request at a                            
                     control system, transferring bootstrap code to the client system to cause                            
                     the client system to load operating system code from a mass storage                                  
                     device of the client system, the operating system code being present on                              
                     the mass storage device at the time when the initial program load request                            
                     was issued from the client system onto the network.                                                  
                     The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the                      
              appealed claims are:                                                                                        
              Kannan et al. (Kannan)                     5,519,870                    May 21, 1996                        
              Kishimoto                                  5,687,073                    Nov. 11, 1997                       
                                                                              (Filed Feb. 17, 1995)                       

                     Claims 1-14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over                          
              Kishimoto in view of Kannan.                                                                                
                     Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced by the examiner and                        
              appellants regarding the above-noted rejections, we make reference to the examiner's                        
              answer (Paper No. 18, mailed Aug. 28, 2000) for the examiner's reasoning in support of                      

                                                           2                                                              





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007