Ex Parte MOHRI et al - Page 1



            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was                             
            not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the                            
            Board.                                                                                     
                                                                        Paper No. 49                   
                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                    
                                           _____________                                               
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                       
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                             
                                           _____________                                               
                           Ex parte MASAHIDE MOHRI, NORIO MATSUDA,                                     
                              SHINICHIRO TANAKA, YOSHIO UCHIDA,                                        
                             YOSHINARI SAWABE, HISASHI WATANABE,                                       
                                         and HIROSHI OGAWA                                             
                                           _____________                                               
                                       Appeal No. 2000-1868                                            
                                      Application 08/730,217                                           
                                           ______________                                              
                                    HEARD: SEPTEMBER 17, 2002                                          
                                          _______________                                              
            Before WALTZ, KRATZ and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                
            WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                        

                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                             
                  This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final                            
            rejection of claims 1, 4 through 7, 9 through 13, 18 and 19,                               
            which are the only claims remaining in this application (Brief,                            
            page 2).1  We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.                               


                  1 The amendment dated Apr. 19, 1999, Paper No. 38, was refused entry by              
            the examiner in an Advisory Action dated May 4, 1999, Paper No. 39 (Brief,                 
            page 2).                                                                                   




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007