The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 49
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte MASAHIDE MOHRI, NORIO MATSUDA,
SHINICHIRO TANAKA, YOSHIO UCHIDA,
YOSHINARI SAWABE, HISASHI WATANABE,
and HIROSHI OGAWA
_____________
Appeal No. 2000-1868
Application 08/730,217
______________
HEARD: SEPTEMBER 17, 2002
_______________
Before WALTZ, KRATZ and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1, 4 through 7, 9 through 13, 18 and 19,
which are the only claims remaining in this application (Brief,
page 2).1 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.
1 The amendment dated Apr. 19, 1999, Paper No. 38, was refused entry by
the examiner in an Advisory Action dated May 4, 1999, Paper No. 39 (Brief,
page 2).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007