Ex Parte MARKOW et al - Page 1




            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written 
                   for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.          
                                                                  Paper No. 21         
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                      ____________                                     
                           BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                      ____________                                     
                    Ex parte MITCHELL A. MARKOW and DAVID E. GOUGH                     
                                      ____________                                     
                                  Appeal No. 2000-1888                                 
                              Application No. 08/885,9841                              
                                      ____________                                     
                                        ON BRIEF                                       
                                      ____________                                     
          Before HAIRSTON, GROSS and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.             
          SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         


                                   DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is a decision on appeal from the Examiner’s final                  
          rejection of claims 1-50, which are all of the claims pending in             
          this application.                                                            
               We affirm-in-part.                                                      
                                      BACKGROUND                                       
               Appellants’ invention relates to a directional microphone               













Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007