Ex Parte TANGREN - Page 1



          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was               
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the              
          Board.                                                                       
                                                             Paper No. 21              
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                        
                                      __________                                       
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                      __________                                       
                               Ex parte JOHN H. TANGREN                                
                                      __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 2000-1890                                   
                                Application 08/828,297                                 
                                     ___________                                       
                                       ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                       
          Before JERRY SMITH, GROSS and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent             
          Judges.                                                                      
          JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                    
                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
          This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134                       
          from the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-19 and 21-24, which                
          constitute all the claims remaining in the application.  First               
          and second amendments after final rejection were filed on                    
          September 15, 1999 and October 27, 1999.  Both amendments were               
          entered by the examiner.                                                     
          The disclosed invention pertains to a disk drive                             
          suspension which is adjusted for enhanced resonance performance.             
                                           1                                           




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007