Ex Parte BLECHL et al - Page 2


                 Appeal No. 2000-1910                                                         Page 2                    
                 Application No. 08/785,716                                                                             


                 Greene et al. (Greene)                   4,826,765                   May 2, 1989                     
                 Bekes et al. (Bekes) “Effects of a High Mr Glutenin Subunit (1Bx20) on the                             
                 Dough Mixing Properties of Wheat Flour,” Journal of Cereal Science,                                    
                 Vol. 19 pp. 3-7 (1994)                                                                                 
                                             GROUNDS OF REJECTION                                                       
                        Claim 20 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by                             
                 Greene.                                                                                                
                        Claim 20 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by                             
                 Bekes.                                                                                                 
                        We reverse the rejection over Greene, and remand this application to the                        
                 examiner to reconsider the rejection over Bekes.                                                       
                                                    DISCUSSION                                                          
                        According to appellants (Brief1, page 2) claim 20 on appeal was originally                      
                 presented in parent Application No. 08/586,331, now U.S. Patent No. 5,650,558                          
                 (the ‘558 patent).  However, in the parent application, the examiner found that                        
                 the subject matter of claim 20 was “separate and distinct” from the claims of the                      
                 ‘558 patent which are drawn to methods of making the wheat plant, the resultant                        
                 wheat plant, the seed of the plant, and the flour of the seed.  Id.                                    
                        Appellants “[n]ote that wheat flour is nothing more than milled (ground)                        
                 wheat seed (Aug. 27, 1998 Anderson Declaration, Appendix C).”  In this regard,                         





                                                                                                                        
                 1 Paper No. 15, received September 25, 1998.                                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007