Ex parte RIDENOUR et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 2000-1922                                                        
          Application No. 08/806,494                                                  



               an inner diameter proximate to the outer diameter of the               
          shaft; and                                                                  
               a flange, disposed at the inner diameter of the retention              
          disc, the flange extending in a direction substantially parallel            
          with the stationary shaft and toward the bearing assembly;                  
          wherein the retention disc, the cartridge bearing sleeve, the               
          bearing assembly and the stationary shaft form a retention                  
          chamber for receivingly retaining contaminants generated by the             
          bearing assembly, and wherein the flange and a portion of the               
          stationary shaft adjacent the flange form a labyrinth seal, the             
          labyrinth seal minimizing the egress of contaminants from the               
          retention chamber.                                                          
               The Examiner relies on the following prior art:                        
          Yasui et al. (Yasui)          5,403,098                Apr. 04,             
                                                                 1995                 
          Krum et al. (Krum)                 5,482,381                Jan.            
                                                                      09,             
                                                                      1996            
               Claims 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, and 10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.            
          § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Krum in view of Yasui.1                 
               Rather than reiterate the arguments of Appellants and the              
          Examiner, reference is made to the Brief (Paper No. 14) and                 
          Answer (Paper No. 16) for the respective details.                           
                                        OPINION                                       


               1The Examiner has withdrawn the 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph,     
          rejection of claim 10 indicating (Answer, page 3) that the entry of the     
          September 1, 1998 amendment obviates the rejection.                         
                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007