Appeal No. 2000-1952
Application No. 09/006,920
With respect to the combination of Gururangan and Heintz, appellants argue that
Heintz is similar to the teachings of Lloyd and relies upon similar arguments. (See brief
at page 8.) While not overly detailed, we again find that the examiner has not made a
prima facie case of obviousness for the combination of the teachings of both
references, and we will not sustain the rejection of independent claim 1 and dependent
claims 14 and 15.
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007