Ex Parte WEN - Page 7



            Appeal No. 2000-1972                                                      
            Application No. 08/928,002                                                
          known to use any of the sensors to sense a magnetic field,                  
          electromagnetic field, infrared photons or fluorescent photons              
          of a label material in an ink.  Absent a teaching in the prior              
          art of using a label material producing a magnetic field, an                
          electromagnetic field, infrared photons or fluorescent                      
          photons, there would be no reason or motivation to utilize                  
          known sensors to detect such fields or photons in ink jet                   
          printing apparatus.                                                         
                              Summary                                                 
                    The rejection of claims 1-4 under 35 U.S.C.                       
          § 102(b) as anticipated by Anderson is sustained.                           
                    The rejection of claims 5-10 under 35 U.S.C.                      
          § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Anderson is sustained as                
          to claims 5 and 10 and reversed as to claims 6-9.                           
                    The rejection of claims 11-13 under 35 U.S.C.                     
          § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Anderson in view of Yokono              
          is sustained.                                                               






                                          7                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007