The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte GENNARO A. CUOMO, BINH Q. NGUYEN,
RICHARD J. REDPATH, and SANDEEP KISHAN SINGHAL
____________
Appeal No. 2000-2009
Application No. 08/832,430
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, KRASS, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges.
BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1-4, 8-13, 17-22, 26, and 27, which are all the claims remaining in
the application.
We reverse.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007