The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 27 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte HARRY J. BOLL and GREGORY G. BOLL ____________ Appeal No. 2000-2053 Application No. 08/764,353 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before KRASS, LALL, and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges. LALL, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner's final rejection of claims 1-4, and 17, all the pending claims in the application. According to Appellants (brief at pages 1 and 2), the disclosed invention pertains to a probe card for high speed testing. This testing involves the testing of integrated circuits (IC’s), also called chips or wafers. If the testing shows that the design or the process employed to manufacture thePage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007