Ex Parte GENTRY et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2000-2079                                                        
          Application 08/883,634                                                      

                                    THE INVENTION                                     
               The appellants claim a low sulfur diesel fuel or spark                 
          ignition fuel composition containing a specified lubricity aid,             
          and claim a method for improving the lubricity of a low sulfur              
          diesel fuel or spark ignition fuel by adding the lubricity aid to           
          the fuel.  Claim 1, directed toward the fuel composition, is                
          illustrative:                                                               
               1.  A fuel composition of improved lubricity comprising a              
          lubricity-increasing amount of a lubricity aid dissolved in a               
          poor lubricity fuel selected from the group consisting of low               
          sulfur diesel fuel and spark ignition fuels, the lubricity aid              
          being selected from the group consisting of alkanolamides of                
          fatty acids, alkanolamides of modified fatty acids and mixtures             
          thereof, provided that if the lubricity aid is other than an                
          alkanolamide of an aryl-substituted fatty acid, the composition             
          further necessarily comprises a haze-inhibiting amount of a                 
          dehazer.                                                                    
                                   THE REFERENCES                                     
          Smith                               2,456,569       Dec. 14, 1948           
          Malec                               4,204,481       May  27, 1980           
          Shubkin                             4,243,538       Jan.  6, 1981           
          Zimmerman et al. (Zimmerman)        4,836,829       Jun.  6, 1989           
          Caprotti et al. (Caprotti)         WO 94/17160      Aug.  4, 1994           
               (PCT application)                                                      
                                    THE REJECTION                                     
               Claims 1-5 and 8-32 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as            
          being unpatentable over Zimmerman in view of Shubkin, Smith,                
          Malec and Caprotti.                                                         

                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007