Ex Parte STRONG - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2000-2147                                                        
          Application No. 08/835,709                                                  
               Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it               
          reads as follows:                                                           
               1.  For association with a floor of a structure to                     
               provide at least one of power and communications                       
               connectivity between a location on said floor and a support            
               of said structure, a raceway comprising:                               
               a housing, substantially equal in length to a                          
               distance between said location on said floor and said                  
               support of said structure, having a conduit that is adapted            
               to receive a line from said support of said structure, said            
               line capable of communicating a signal to said location on             
               said floor; and                                                        
               a fastener that can be associated with said housing                    
               to at least substantially ensconce said line, said fastener            
               and said housing cooperating to integrate a floor cover with           
               said raceway.                                                          
               The references relied on by the examiner are:                          
          Storck                        4,270,833           Jun.  2, 1981             
          Batty et al. (Batty)          4,780,094           Oct. 25, 1988             
          Wegmann, Jr. (Wegmann)      5,267,367             Dec.  7, 1993             
               Claims 1, 2, 5 and 7 through 12 stand rejected under                   
          35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Batty.                           
               Claims 3, 4, 13 through 15 and 17 through 22 stand rejected            
          under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Batty in view           
          of Wegmann.                                                                 




                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007