Ex Parte BODOR - Page 1



                            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                   
                                   for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                            

                                                                                            Paper No. 57                 

                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                       
                                                     __________                                                          

                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                        
                                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                           
                                                     __________                                                          
                                           Ex parte NICHOLAS S. BODOR                                                    
                                                     ___________                                                         
                                                Appeal No. 2000-2156                                                     
                                              Application No. 08/431,727                                                 
                                                     __________                                                          
                                               HEARD: March 7, 2002                                                      
                                                     __________                                                          
              Before WINTERS, SCHEINER, and MILLS, Administrative Patent Judges.                                         
              WINTERS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                      
                                               DECISION ON APPEAL                                                        
                     This appeal was taken from the examiner’s decision rejecting claims 110 through                     
              115, 123, and 124, which are all of the claims remaining in the application.                               


                                                 Representative Claim                                                    
                     Claim 123, which is illustrative of the subject matter on appeal, reads as follows:                 
                     123.  A method for the design of a soft drug entity, the in vivo metabolic                          
              disposition of which proceeds in predictable manner into an inactive metabolite moiety                     
              and nontoxic moieties thereof after eliciting its desired therapeutic response, comprising                 
              (a) identifying a nontoxic, therapeutically inactive candidate metabolite of a given drug                  

              entity known to elicit a particular therapeutic response, and (b) structurally converting                  
              such therapeutically inactive metabolite into an activated, structurally-related drug                      





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007