Ex Parte TROTT - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2000-2168                                                        
          Application 09/130,383                                                      

               a panel having a longitudinal dimension substantially co-              
          extensive with the near boundary dimension of the sink, a                   
          longitudinally extending, horizontal upper margin to overlay the            
          lip and disposed at an acute angle relative to the panel and a              
          trough at the lower margin to, when the panel is attached to the            
          lip to direct the panel rearwardly to locate the trough adjacent            
          the cabinet faces; and                                                      
               means for temporarily securing the panel to dispose the                
          upper margin co-extensive and proximate the sink near boundary to           
          position the panel over the cabinetry faces.                                
               The following references are relied on by the examiner:                
          Gray                     1,234,658           July 24, 1917                  
          Piper                    1,857,328           May  10, 1932                  
          Laird                    4,620,332           Nov.  4, 1986                  
          Carroll                  5,381,564           Jan. 17, 1995                  
               Independent claims 1 and 3 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.              
          § 102(b) as being anticipated by Piper or Carroll or Gray.  Claim           
          2 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  As evidence of                    
          obviousness, the examiner relies upon Carroll in view of Laird              
          for one rejection, with an additional rejection based upon Gray             
          in view of Carroll, further in view of Laird.                               
               Rather than repeat the positions of the appellant and the              
          examiner, reference is made to the brief and the answer for the             
          respective details thereof.                                                 



                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007