Appeal No. 2000-2184
Application 08/629,626
examiner’s rejection of independent claim 11.
Since we have not sustained the examiner’s rejection of
any of the independent claims, we also do not sustain the
rejection of any of the claims which depend therefrom. Although
appellant has separately argued many of the dependent claims on
appeal, there is no need to consider these separate arguments in
view of our decision with respect to the independent claims.
In summary, the decision of the examiner rejecting claims
1-26 and 30-32 is reversed.
REVERSED
)
KENNETH W. HAIRSTON )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JERRY SMITH )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
STUART S. LEVY )
Administrative Patent Judge )
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007