The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 16 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte THEODORE D. WUGOFSKI _____________ Appeal No. 2000-2210 Application No. 09/002,828 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before KRASS, RUGGIERO, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges. RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on the appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-19, which are all of the claims pending in the present application. An amendment filed February 7, 2000 after final rejection was denied entry by the Examiner. The claimed invention relates to a software architecture for a convergence system which integrates the functionality of computers and other separate devices. More particularly, the architecture includes views, overlays, and system services. ThePage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007