The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 15 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte JAMES P. KISLANKO __________ Appeal No. 2000-2220 Application 08/962,428 ___________ ON BRIEF ___________ Before JERRY SMITH, FLEMING and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges. JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-4, 6-11, 13-17, 19 and 20. Claims 5, 12 and 18 have been indicated to contain allowable subject matter. An amendment after final rejection was filed on September 13, 1999 and was entered by the examiner. The disclosed invention pertains to a computer-based system for inferring an output date expressed in a format having a four-digit calendar year from a historical input date expressedPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007