Ex Parte WICKS et al - Page 2




            Appeal No. 2000-2226                                                    Page 2                    
            Application No. 08/827,107                                                                        


                   By using a virtual dialer in lieu of a physical, numeric keypad, the appellants            
            assert that their wireless telephone allows more room for an enhanced display without             
            increasing the size of the unit.  (Spec. at 3.)  The virtual dialer includes a short joystick     
            and an image of a telephone’s numeric keypad on a display.  The joystick is used to               
            move a cursor around the image.  When the cursor highlights the image of the key                  
            representing the digit to be dialed, the joystick is pressed.  The wireless telephone also        
            includes an antenna movable between an extended and a retracted position.  When in                
            the retracted position, the antenna doubles as a belt clip.                                       


                   A further understanding of the invention can be achieved by reading the following          
            claim:                                                                                            
                         15. A wireless telephone unit comprising:                                            
                         an antenna which rotates about a pivotal joint so as to be movable                   
                   between a first extended position and a second retracted position;                         
                         wherein said antenna serves as a clip when in said second                            
                   retracted position.                                                                        


                   Claims 1, 7, 8, 10, 11, and 14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                  
            obvious over U.S. Patent No. 5,436,954 (“Nishiyama”) in view of U.S. Patent No.                   
            5,841,849 (“Macor”)  Claims 5, 6, 12, and 13 stand rejected under § 103(a) as obvious             
            over Nishiyama in view of Macor further in view of U.S. Patent No. 5,551,069                      








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007