Ex Parte ISHIBUCHI et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2000-2229                                                        
          Application No. 09/126,766                                                  

          the corrugated fiberboard sheet . . . into predetermined lengths”           
          (specification, page 1).  Representative claim 8 reads as                   
          follows:                                                                    
               8.  A rotary cutoff apparatus comprising:                              
               a knife cylinder rotatably supported by an apparatus frame             
          and having a helical knife retractably mounted on a                         
          circumferential surface of said knife cylinder via a cushioning             
          support mechanism;                                                          
               an anvil cylinder rotatably supported by the apparatus frame           
          and juxtaposed with said knife cylinder, said anvil cylinder                
          having on its circumferential surface a substantially rigid                 
          coating layer engageable with a cutting edge of said helical                
          knife when said knife cylinder and said anvil cylinder rotate in            
          opposite directions; and                                                    
               said helical knife being movable between a projected                   
          position in which said helical knife projects outwardly of said             
          knife cylinder when said cutting edge is out of contact with said           
          coating layer of said anvil cylinder and a retracted position in            
          which said helical knife is retracted inwardly of said knife                
          cylinder when said cutting edge is in contact with said coating             
          layer.                                                                      

                                   THE PRIOR ART                                      
               The references relied on by the examiner to support the                
          final rejection are:                                                        
          Schriber et al. (Schriber)    4,131,047           Dec. 26, 1978             
          Von Schriltz                  4,289,055           Sep. 15, 1981             
          Ohmori et al. (Ohmori)        4,630,514           Dec. 23, 1986             
          Steidinger                    5,086,683           Feb. 11, 1992             
          Hornung                       2,021,061           Nov. 11, 1971             
          German Patent Document2                                                     

               2 An English language translation of this reference,                   
          prepared by the United States Patent and Trademark Office, is               
          appended hereto.                                                            
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007