Appeal No. 2000-2232
Application 08/483,928
unpatentable Lemelson '563 in view of Camras and Kimura.
D. Rejection of claims 24, 29 and 33 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Lemelson '563 in view of Camras and
Kimura and Munsey
Claims 24, 29 and 33 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over Lemelson '563 in view of Camras and
Kimura and Munsey.
First, we note that the Examiner has only cited Munsey
for its disclosure of a digital memory . Its application by 32
the Examiner is irrelevant to the issues discussed above in
regard to Camras, and it makes no disclosure as mounting of a
video camera, recorder and printer.
Furthermore, these claims depend upon independent claims
21, 28 and 32 respectively, and contain limitations not
relevant to our reasons for the reversal of the Examiner’s
rejection of the parent claims over Lemelson '563 in view of
Camras and Kimura.
Therefore, we will not sustain the rejection of claims
24, 29 and 33 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over
32 Answer, page 13.
20
Page: Previous 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007