Ex Parte NEAL et al - Page 1



               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not     
               written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.     
                                                            Paper No. 14              

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                    _____________                                     
                           BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                         
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                    _____________                                     
                         Ex parte DAN M. NEAL and PAUL CLOUSER                        
                                    _____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 2000-2266                                 
                              Application No. 09/069,700                              
                                    ______________                                    
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                    _______________                                   
          Before FLEMING, RUGGIERO, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent            
          Judges.                                                                     
          RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      
                                                                                     
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on the appeal from the final rejection of           
          claims 1-29, which are all of the claims pending in the present             
          application.  An amendment filed December 27, 1999 after final              
          rejection was denied entry by the Examiner.                                 
               The claimed invention relates to a connector to be employed            
          in an enhanced bus architecture utilizing differential signaling.           
          More particularly, a modified pin structure in the form of a                
          split pin configuration is used to connect a differential signal            
          pair on one printed circuit board, cable, or other transmission             





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007