Appeal No. 2000-2267 Application No. 08/764,576 discussed deficiencies in Eckert, Horn, and Seewaldt. Similarly, we find that the Gardner and Cowan references, applied to address the housing end structure and cable connection features of several of the dependent claims, do not overcome the innate deficiencies of Eckert, Horn, Seewaldt, Lunzer and Gschwender. For all of the above reasons, because the Examiner has not established a prima facie case of obviousness since all of the limitations of the appealed claims are not taught or suggested by the applied prior art, the Examiner’s 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of independent claims 1 and 8, as well as claims 2-5, 7, 9, and 10 dependent thereon, is not sustained. 11Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007