Ex Parte BALTZ et al - Page 11



          Appeal No. 2000-2267                                                        
          Application No. 08/764,576                                                  

          discussed deficiencies in Eckert, Horn, and Seewaldt.  Similarly,           
          we find that the Gardner and Cowan references, applied to address           
          the housing end structure and cable connection features of                  
          several of the dependent claims, do not overcome the innate                 
          deficiencies of Eckert, Horn, Seewaldt, Lunzer and Gschwender.              
               For all of the above reasons, because the Examiner has not             
          established a prima facie case of obviousness since all of the              
          limitations of the appealed claims are not taught or suggested by           
          the applied prior art, the Examiner’s 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)                    
          rejection of independent claims 1 and 8, as well as claims 2-5,             
          7, 9, and 10 dependent thereon, is not sustained.                           














                                         11                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007