Appeal No. 2000-2276
Application No. 08/727,730
the only source of a teaching for connecting a wireless digital
network to the Internet using the vocoder protocol of the
wireless network, we agree with the appellant’s argument (brief,
page 9) that the examiner has resorted to impermissible hindsight
to demonstrate the obviousness of the claimed invention. The
IS-54 compression algorithm teachings of Glaser fail to cure the
noted shortcoming in the teachings of Pohjakallio and Yang.
Thus, the obviousness rejection of claims 1 through 3, 14 through
18, 20 through 25, 31 through 33, 36 through 40, 42 and 43 is
reversed.
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007