Ex Parte MURTHY et al - Page 1



          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the             
          Board.                                                                      
                                                            Paper No. 35              
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                     __________                                       
           Ex parte MANOHAR MURTHY, JOHN F. WAKERLY and ARTHUR I. LAURSEN             
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 2000-2282                                  
                               Application 08/713,046                                 
                                     ___________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                      
          Before KRASS, JERRY SMITH, and FLEMING, Administrative Patent               
          Judges.                                                                     
          FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of               
          claims 25-31.  Claims 1-24 have been cancelled.                             
               The invention relates to the monitoring of packet traffic              
          arriving at the bridges and routers.  See Appellants’                       
          specification, page 1, lines 3-13.  Appellants disclose that                
          according to the invention, monitoring of any or all network                
          segments on a multi-port bridge or router may be carried out from           
                                          1                                           




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007