Ex Parte PIEL et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2001-0018                                                        
          Application 08/998,559                                                      

          The disclosed invention pertains to a combined acoustic                     
          backing and interconnect module for connecting an array of                  
          ultrasonic transducer elements to a multiplicity of cable                   
          conductors which utilizes the volume of the backing layer to                
          extend a high density of interconnections perpendicular to the              
          transducer array.                                                           
          Representative claim 6 is reproduced as follows:                            
               6.   A combined acoustic backing and interconnect module               
          comprising:                                                                 
                                                                                     
               a first flexible planar circuit board having a first                   
          multiplicity of conductive traces, and support means attached to            
          opposing sides of a section of said first flexible circuit board            
          and having a planar surface extending generally perpendicular to            
          said section of said first flexible planar circuit board, an end            
          of each of said first multiplicity of conductive traces being               
          exposed at said planar surface of said support means, said                  
          support means being made of acoustic damping material.                      
          The examiner relies on the following reference:                             
          Kawabe et al. (Kawabe)        4,825,115          Apr. 25, 1989              
          Claims 6-12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  As                       
          evidence of obviousness the examiner offers Kawabe taken alone.             
          Rather than repeat the arguments of appellants or the                       
          examiner, we make reference to the briefs and the answer for the            
          respective details thereof.                                                 



                                         -2-                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007