Ex parte PENICAUT - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not     
               written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.     

                                                            Paper No. 24              


                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                    
                                     _____________                                    
                            BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                        
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     _____________                                    
                                Ex parte NICOLAS PENICAUT                             
                                     _____________                                    
                                 Appeal No. 2001-0038                                 
                                Application No. 08/992,999                            
                                    ______________                                    
                                       ON BRIEF                                       
                                    _______________                                   
          Before STAAB, NASE, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                 
          STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         
                                                                                     

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on an appeal from the final rejection               
          of claims 1-3.  No other claims are currently pending.  An                  
          amendment filed subsequent to the final rejection has not been              
          entered.                                                                    
               Appellant’s invention pertains to a brake for an in-line               
          roller skate.  An understanding of the invention can be                     
          derived from a reading of exemplary claim 1, which appears in               







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007