The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 17 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte LOUIS DISCHLER ___________ Appeal No. 2001-0140 Application No. 09/356,916 __________ ON BRIEF _________ Before COHEN, STAAB, and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges. CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through 9 and claims 17 through 20, which are all the claims pending in the application. Claims 10 through 16 have been canceled. The appellant’s invention is a dispenser system with at least one binary dispensing array. An understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 1, which appears in the appendix to the appellant’s brief.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007