Ex Parte HAUSER - Page 5




              Appeal No. 2001-0158                                                                  Page 5                
              Application No. 08/873,250                                                                                  


                    Iwakiri discloses an apparatus for manufacturing semiconductor wafers which                           
             includes means for identifying each wafer and storing the identification information.  The                   
             history of each wafer, such as how the wafer was transferred and how the wafer was                           
             processed, is stored.  Iwakiri discloses that the various steps in the wafer processing                      
             operation are controlled by a computer and that the various computers are connected to                       
             a host computer through a computer network.  A correspondence between the quality                            
             information reported on the wafer basis and associated wafers is made and put into the                       
             database of the host computer.                                                                               
                    Iwakiri does not disclose or suggest the claimed “second means” for                                   
             interconnecting a first means in a physically operative manner so as to form the                             
             respective subgroup units.  In addition, Iwakiri does not disclose or suggest the claimed                    
             additional “interconnecting means for interconnecting” the various subgroups, which                          
             additional means includes means for storing the slices, means for manipulating the                           
             slices and means for transporting the slices.  This additional “interconnecting means for                    
             interconnecting” provides the means for integrating the various subgroup operations of                       
             the slicing center.                                                                                          
                    The examiner has not shown that these two claimed means, namely, the “second                          
             means” and the additional “interconnecting means for interconnecting” are disclosed or                       
             suggested in the prior art.  As such, the examiner has failed to establish a prima facie                     
             case of obviousness.                                                                                         








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007