Appeal No. 2001-0161
Application No. 08/784,087
We note that claim 37 recites a method similar to claim 13
for establishing a workable connection between the transceiver
and a host. Furthermore, we note that claim 44 is directed to a
system and claim 22 is directed to a machine for establishing a
workable connection between a transceiver and a host.
Appellant argues on page 2 of the Reply Brief that the cited
claim language requires establishing a workable connection
between the transceiver and host whereby data in IR transmissions
between them will be accepted. Appellant argues that obtaining
acceptance of the IR transmission is a useful, concrete and
tangible result.
We find that Appellant's claims recite subject matter that
is a practical application of linking a transceiver device LSAP
with a host LSAP for transmitting and accepting data in IR
transmission exchanged therebetween. Therefore, we find that
Appellant's claims 13 through 30 and 37 through 50 recite
statutory subject matter.
77
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007