Ex Parte ZEITER et al - Page 7


             Appeal No. 2001-0199                                                                                     
             Application 09/179,813                                                                                   
                    We therefore affirm this rejection.                                                               
                                                   Summary of Decision                                                
                    The rejection of Claims 20-26, 28, and 29 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being                       
             anticipated by Breitler is affirmed.                                                                     
                    The rejection of Claims 20-29 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable                      
             over Breitler is affirmed.                                                                               
                                             Time Period for Response                                                 
                    No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal                    
             may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).                                                                 



                                                     AFFIRMED                                                         


                                                                            )                                         
                                  BRADLEY R. GARRIS                        )                                         
                                  Administrative Patent Judge               )                                         
                                                                            )                                         
                                                                            )                                         
                                                                            ) BOARD OF PATENT                         
                                  CATHERINE TIMM                           )                                         
                                  Administrative Patent Judge               )                                         
                                                                            )   APPEALS AND                           
                                                                            )                                         
                                                                            )                                         
                                  JAMES T. MOORE                           ) INTERFERENCES                           
                                  Administrative Patent Judge               )                                         
                                                                            )                                         


             JTM/ ki                                                                                                  




                                                          7                                                           



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007