Ex parte CRINION - Page 5




              Appeal No. 2001-0210                                                                   Page 5                 
              Application No. 08/560,675                                                                                    


                     Hoffman discloses a desk having a system of ducts through which wires and the like                     
              can be run.  The Hoffman desk comprises a pair of opposed side frames 2 and 3 (Figure                         
              1) which appear to be interconnected by a pair of beams (unnumbered, but shown                                
              attached to side frame 3 in Figure 4 and side frame 2 in Figure 2), a tabletop 4, and a                       
              channel member 6.  The channel member is mounted on a mechanism that allows it to be                          
              movable between a closed position beneath the tabletop (Figure 1), through a partially                        
              open position (Figure 2), to a fully open position spaced from the tabletop a distance                        
              sufficient to allow wires to be inserted or removed (Figure 4).  As is best shown in Figure                   
              4, the channel member is movably connected to the side frames through connecting                              
              means 16 and 28, with notches 37 being provided in the side frames to facilitate the                          
              interconnection of several desks, and notches 38 to permit wires to be inserted                               
              (translation, page 8).  We do not agree with the rationale advanced by the examiner on                        
              pages 4 and 5 of the Answer regarding the correspondence between the terminology of                           
              claim 40 and the Hoffman structure.                                                                           
                     There is a basic structural and operational difference between the Hoffman                             
              arrangement and that of claim 40. The channel member in the Hoffman invention is opened                       
              and closed by moving it with regard to the stationary work surfaces, side frames and                          
              notches.  The arrangement recited in claim 40 requires the opposite, which is that the                        
              channel member be “fixed to each side frame in an open notch thereof” (emphasis added),                       









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007