Ex Parte HIMMELSBACH et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2001-0242                                                        
          Application No. 09/183,114                                                  

          discontinuous areas of pressure sensitive adhesive composition,             
          such that the pressure sensitive adhesive composition only                  
          partially coats said surface, and wherein the adhesive tape under a         
          tensile load of 10 N/cm has an extension of greater than 10% and,           
          when bonded to a substrate, can be removed from the substrate by            
          pulling on the adhesive tape in the direction of the plane of the           
          bond formed by the bonding of said adhesive tape to said substrate.         
          3.  Backing material according to Claim 4 , wherein the self-               
          adhesive composition is a hotmelt adhesive composition having a             
          dynamic-complex glass transition temperature with a frequency of            
          0.1 rad/s of less than 5/C.                                                 
                                       PRIOR ART                                      
               The prior art references relied upon by the examiner are:              
          Korpman                       4,024,312           May 17, 1977              
          Takemoto et al. (Takemoto)    0 353 972 A1        Feb. 7, 1990              
          (Published European Patent Application)                                     
          Kreckel et al. (Kreckel)      WO 92/11333         Jul. 9, 1992              
          (Published International Application under PCT)                             
                                       REJECTION                                      
               The appealed claims stand rejected as follows:                         
          1) Claims 16, 2, 4 and 12 through 15 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as               
               unpatentable over the disclosure of Kreckel;                           
          2) Claim 5 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over the                   
               combined disclosures of Kreckel and Korpman; and                       
          3)  Claims 3 and 6 through 11 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                      
               unpatentable over the combined disclosures of Kreckel and              
               Takemoto.                                                              

                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007