Ex Parte STICKLES et al - Page 15

                  Appeal No. 2001-0299                                                                                              15                    
                  Application No. 08/993,861                                                                                                              


                           In summary, the rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 102 of claims 1, 2, 7, 8, 11, 12, 14                                              
                  and 15 as being anticipated by Koch and of claims 1 and 12 as being anticipated by                                                      
                  Angel remain affirmed and the rejection of claims 7, 8, 9 and 14 as being anticipated by                                                
                  Dooley is reversed.                                                                                                                     
                                                               GRANTED-IN-PART                                                                            





                                             NEAL E. ABRAMS                                        )                                                      
                                             Administrative Patent Judge                           )                                                      
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                                                                                   ) BOARD OF PATENT                                      
                                             JEFFREY V. NASE                                       )     APPEALS                                          
                                             Administrative Patent Judge                           )       AND                                            
                                                                                                   )  INTERFERENCES                                       
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                             JENNIFER D. BAHR                                      )                                                      
                                             Administrative Patent Judge                           )                                                      















Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007