The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 24 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte DARYLE PAT DONNER, HAROLD WAINE FRIESEN, DAVID R. HAWKINS, and STEPHEN TAYLOR ZERBS ____________ Appeal No. 2001-0382 Application No. 08/861,481 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before BARRETT, FLEMING, and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judges. RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on the appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-14 and 24, which are all of the claims pending in the present application. Claims 15-23 have been canceled. An amendment after final rejection filed June 4, 1999, and resubmitted on August 5, 1999, was denied entry by the Examiner. The claimed invention relates to a cable having at least two conductor pairs in which each conductor pair includes two individual insulated metallic conductors twisted together to definePage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007