The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the board Paper 17 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte GAYLORD M. KISSINGER ____________ Appeal 2001-0455 Application 08/509,8911 ____________ Before: McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge , and SCHAFER and LEE, Administrative Patent Judges. McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge . Decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 The appeal is from a decision of a primary examiner rejecting claims 1-5. We affirm, but make a recommendation pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.196(c). A. Findings of fact The record supports the following findings by at least a preponderance of the evidence. 2 1 Application for patent filed 1 August 1995. The real party in interest is General Electric Company, GE Plastics Division, of Pittsfield, MA (Paper 13, Appeal Brief, page 1). 2 To the extent these findings of fact discuss legal issues, they may be treated as conclusions of law.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007