Ex Parte JANJIC et al - Page 1




                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written           
                                for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                    
                                                                                 Paper No. 35                 
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                              
                                                __________                                                    
                            BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                                __________                                                    
                                       Ex parte NEBOISA JANJIC, and                                           
                                                LARRY GOLD                                                    
                                                __________                                                    
                                            Appeal No. 2001-0545                                              
                                         Application No. 08/442,423                                           
                                                __________                                                    
                                                 ON BRIEF                                                     
                                                __________                                                    
                Before MILLS, GRIMES, and GREEN, Administrative Patent Judges.                                
                GREEN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                           

                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                      This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s                  
                final rejection of claims 20-22.  The claims read as follows, with the independent            
                claim appearing first:                                                                        
                      22.    A method for inhibiting angiogenesis comprising administering a                  
                             pharmaceutically effective amount of a nucleic acid bFGF ligand.                 
                      20. The method of claim 22 wherein said nucleic acid bFGF ligand is                     
                             identified according to a method comprising the steps of:                        
                             a)    preparing a candidate mixture of nucleic acids;                            
                             b)    contacting the candidate mixture with bFGF, wherein nucleic                
                                   acids having an increased affinity to bFGF relative to the                 






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007