Ex Parte GANGITANO - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2001-0605                                                        
          Application No. 08/811,827                                                  

          whenever the received signal strength falls below a predetermined           
          threshold.                                                                  
               Claim 1 is illustrative of the invention and reads as follows:         
          1.  A home satellite television receiver, comprising:                       
               circuitry configured to detect a received signal strength of a         
          satellite television signal received at an antenna and to determine         
          whether said received signal strength is above a threshold; and             
               circuitry configured to automatically generate a visual                
          indication that said received signal strength is below said                 
          threshold for display on a television coupled to said circuitry             
          configured to detect.                                                       
               The Examiner relies on the following prior art:                        
          Omoto et al. (Omoto)          4,935,814           Jun. 19, 1990             
               Claims 1, 2, 5-7 and 9-12 stand finally rejected under                 
          35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Omoto.  Claims 3 and 8           
          stand finally rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being                    
          unpatentable over Omoto.                                                    
               Rather than reiterate the arguments of Appellant and the               
          Examiner, reference is made to the Briefs1 and Answer for the               
          respective details.                                                         


               1 The Appeal Brief was filed October 29, 1999 (Paper No. 8).  In       
          response to the Examiner’s Answer dated January 19, 2000, (Paper No. 9), a  
          Reply Brief was filed March 20, 2000 (Paper No. 10), which was acknowledged 
          and entered by the Examiner in the communication dated March 30, 2000 (Paper
          No. 11).                                                                    
                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007