Ex parte BAHR - Page 1




                              The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                   
                                      for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                           
                                                                                                 Paper No. 12              
                                UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                  
                                                      ____________                                                         
                                     BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                    
                                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                                         
                                                      ____________                                                         
                                               Ex parte RANDALL A. BAHR                                                    
                                                      ____________                                                         
                                                  Appeal No. 2001-0610                                                     
                                                Application No. 08/931,932                                                 
                                                      ____________                                                         
                                                         ON BRIEF                                                          
                                                      ____________                                                         
              Before ABRAMS, FRANKFORT, and STAAB, Administrative Patent Judges.                                           
              ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                         


                                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                                        
                     This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-10, 12,                  
              13 and 15-18.  Claim 11 has been canceled, and claim 14 has been objected to.                                


                     We REVERSE.                                                                                           
                                                    BACKGROUND                                                             
                     The appellant's invention relates to a torque limited applicator, that is, a device for               
              applying a limited amount of torque to a fastener.  An understanding of the invention can be                 









Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007