Ex Parte ITA et al - Page 7



          Appeal No. 2001-0645                                                        
          Application No. 09/055,472                                                  

          gel filler material comprising glucomannan.  Only appellants                
          teach the use of such a filler material for an implantable                  
          prosthesis, and the benefits derived therefrom.2  Thus, the                 
          rejection is clearly based on the use of impermissible hindsight.           
          Since the evidence of obviousness would not have been suggestive            
          of the claimed invention, the rejection on appeal cannot be                 
          sustained.                                                                  
                                      REVERSED                                        



                         IRWIN CHARLES COHEN           )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )                              
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              
                                                       ) BOARD OF PATENT              
                         LAWRENCE J. STAAB             )   APPEALS AND                
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )  INTERFERENCES               
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              
                         JEFFREY V. NASE               )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )                              
          ljs:vsh                                                                     



               2 See page 2, lines 21-22, of appellants’ specification.               
                                          7                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007