Appeal No. 2001-0654
Application 08/910,315
Emery, we fail to find any support for the Examiner’s assertion
that Emery teaches personal identity information as required by
claims 1 through 8.
The Examiner has further rejected claim 3 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as being obvious over Hillis in view of Emery and further
in view of Wizgall. The Examiner relies on Wizgall for the
teaching of a detachable mass memory card. See page 5 of the
Examiner’s answer. We note that the Examiner for this rejection
also relies on Emery for the teaching of personal identity
information unique to a person using the transmitter and
exclusive of any transmitter identifying number and exclusive of
the transmitter’s location as required by claim 3 due to its
dependence on claim 1. We therefore will not sustain the
rejection of claim 3 for the same reasons as above.
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007