Appeal No. 2001-0688
Application No. 08/689,721 Page 14
CONCLUSION
To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims
11 and 12 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, is reversed.
In addition, we remand the case to the examiner for action
consistent with our findings.
This application, by virtue of its "special" status,
requires an immediate action, see Manual of Patent Examining
Procedure (MPEP) § 708.01(d) (Eigth Edition, August 2001). It is
important that the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences be
promptly informed of any action affecting the appeal in this
case.
REVERSED AND REMANDED
JAMES D. THOMAS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)) BOARD OF PATENT
ANITA PELLMAN GROSS ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
STUART S. LEVY )
Administrative Patent Judge )
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007