The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 25 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte NAOMITU TANAKA, TATSUO KOYAMA and MASANORI SANO ____________ Appeal No. 2001-0731 Application No. 08/904,868 ____________ HEARD : May 8, 2002 ____________ Before GARRIS, JEFFREY T. SMITH and MOORE, Administrative Patent Judges. JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Applicants appeal the decision of the Primary Examiner finally rejecting claims 1, 2, 7, 9 and 11.1 We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 134. 1 Claim 3 to 6 and 13 to 16 are pending in the present application and have been withdrawn from consideration. Claim 7 has been amended and claims 10 and 12 were canceled in an amendment filed June 13, 2000. (Brief, p. 2.) The Examiner has indicated that the amendment has been entered. (Answer, p. 2.)Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007