The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 21 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte PETER WILLIAM LEDNOR and KATHERINE SEARCY-ROBERTS ____________ Appeal No. 2001-0784 Application No. 08/755,844 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before CAROFF, DELMENDO, and MOORE, Administrative Patent Judges. CAROFF, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This a decision on appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 and 4-8, all of the claims remaining in appellants’ involved application. The claims at issue are directed to a process for preparing a ceramic foam support impregnated with a catalytically active component other than an inorganic oxide. Appellants stipulate on page 2 of their brief that all of the claims at issue stand or fall together for purposes of this appeal.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007