Appeal No. 2001-0786
Application No. 09/089,575
persuasive weight. Therefore, the rejection of claims 2 and 8 is
affirmed.
Conclusion
The rejection of claim 1 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as
anticipated by Duerr is reversed. The rejection of claims 3 and
4 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over Duerr in view of
Kragle is reversed. The rejection of claims 2 and 8 under 35
U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over Duerr in view of Kragle is
affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
WILLIAM F. PATE, III )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
ADRIENE LEPIANE HANLON ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JAMES T. MOORE )
Administrative Patent Judge )
ALH:hh
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007