Ex Parte WOODNORTH et al - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2001-0789                                                                       2               
              Application No. 09/106,625                                                                                 



              THE INVENTION                                                                                              
              The invention is directed to an alkaline electrochemical cell having a steel casing                        
              preplated on the inside with a layer of nickel.  A layer of cobalt is applied over the nickel              
              layer.  A layer of carbon is applied over the cobalt layer.  Additional limitations are                    
              described in the following illustrative claim.                                                             
                                                     THE CLAIMS                                                          
              Claim 1 is illustrative of appellants’ invention and is reproduced below.                                  
              1.     An alkaline electrochemical cell comprising a cylindrical steel casing housing the                  
              contents of said cell, a positive and a negative terminal, an anode comprising zinc, a                     
              cathode comprising manganese dioxide, and aqueous alkaline electrolyte solution, wherein                   
              the inside surface of said steel casing is preplated with a layer of nickel, said steel casing             
              being coated on the inside surface with a coating comprising a layer comprising cobalt and                 
              a layer comprising carbon, wherein said layer comprising cobalt is applied over said nickel                
              layer and the layer comprising carbon is applied over said cobalt layer.                                   

                                           THE REFERENCES OF RECORD                                                      
              As evidence of obviousness, the examiner relies upon the following references:                             
              Schneider et al. (Schneider)       4,760,002                    Jul.   26, 1988                            
              Junkers et al. (Junkers)           4, 910,096                   Mar. 20, 1990                              
              Bennett                            5,302,473                    Apr. 12, 1994                              
              Mototani et al. (Mototani)         5,721,072                    Feb.  24, 1998                             
              Canadian Patent (Canada ‘697) 1263697                           Dec.  05, 1989                             

                                                 THE REJECTIONS                                                          
              Claims 1, 5 through 7, 9 through 15, 18 through 23 and 25 stand rejected under                             






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007