Ex Parte MATISZ et al - Page 10




            Appeal No. 2001-0861                                                        Page 10               
            Application No. 08/741,964                                                                        


            same conclusion with regard to the attachment rings disclosed by Brown.  This being               
            the case, we will not sustain the rejection of claims 6 and 10.                                   
                                                 SUMMARY                                                      
                   The rejection of claims 1 and 17 as being anticipated by Mecca is sustained.               
                   Both rejections of claims 2, 18 and 19 as being unpatentable over Mecca in view            
            of Harte are sustained.                                                                           
                   The rejection of claim 4 as being unpatentable over Mecca in view of Harte and             
            Whittaker is not sustained.                                                                       
                   The rejection of claims 6 and 10 as being unpatentable over Brown in view of               
            Mecca and Whittaker is not sustained.                                                             
                   The decision of the examiner is affirmed-in-part.                                          























Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007