Ex Parte KUHN et al - Page 3




             Appeal No. 2001-0899                                                                      3               
             Application No. 08/799,174                                                                                




                                         THE REFERENCES OF RECORD                                                      
             As evidence of obviousness, the examiner relies upon the following references:                            
             Baldyga                      4,000,100                          Dec. 28, 1976                             
             Kashiwase et al.             4,371,656                          Feb.   1, 1983                            
                                                                                                                      

                                                 THE REJECTION                                                         
                    Claims 2 through 12 and 14 through 16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)                      
             as being unpatentable over the combination of Baldyga and Kashiwase.                                      




                                                    OPINION                                                            

             We have carefully considered all of the arguments advanced by the appellants and                          
             the examiner and agree with the appellants for the reasons set forth in the Brief and those               
             herein that the rejection of record is not well founded.  Accordingly, we reverse the                     
             rejection.                                                                                                


                                                                                                                      
             The Rejection Under § 103(a)                                                                              

                    "[T]he examiner bears the initial burden, on review of the prior art or on any other               







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007