The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 22 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte WILLIAM J. TOUREK and SAMUEL DAISY JR. __________ Appeal No. 2001-0941 Application No. 08/890,705 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before WINTERS, SCHEINER, and GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judges. GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 6-10 and 17-28, all of the claims remaining. Claim 6 is representative and reads as follows: 6. A method for manufacturing by dry granulation a tablet for the delivery of the active ingredient of St. John’s Wort, said tablet comprising by weight of the tablet: 40 to 75% by weight St. John’s Wort extract, 1.0-5.0% by weight binder, 8-18% by weight dissolution regulator, up to 30% by weight filler, 0.2 to 5.0% by weight glidant as a final proportion of glidant, and 0.5 to 2.5% by weight lubricant as a final proportion of lubricant;Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007